Posts Tagged ‘ideas about new media’

The New York Times is now following you on Twitter! How can we help you?

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

When I first learned about the New York Times hiring a Social Media Editor (that link has a good internal memo about their plans), I salivated on my keyboard. Then, reports came in that the job might be more about reigning in prolific reporters (that link is a bit mean, but hey, it’s Gawker), like David Carr, who tweet about whatever they please. That job sounds less fun. I was hoping for innovation, pushing limits, starting new trends…even if that means great crashing fireballs of failure. Anything but mediocrity and safely following the pack. Jump into the fray, NYT!

*Calming down, wiping keyboard* (more…)

Michael Jackson’s Wikipedia entry changing in the hours after his death

Monday, June 29th, 2009

I’m stoked that someone had a similar idea to my Twitter MJ trend tracking, and executed it better.

By Justin Day and via Uppity Stuff: emptyage, a social media type dude who is now on my blogroll.

Twettiquete and netiquette. You’re going to get followers: Don’t be creeped out, reciprocate.

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

A note to friends: I have realized that people are presenting themselves as social media experts who the things I know, and they’re getting editorial jobs because of it. Or, at least, most editorial jobs these days have some social media savvy requirement. This is a practice in explaining the things I know, to be transferred to my online portfolio to show that I’m fancy with the internet. I’d appreciate your feedback here if you have any.

twitter-followWhenever people are new to Twitter, they talk about how weird it is that people are following them. “I haven’t written anything!” or “I don’t even know who they are!” they cry, weirded out and slightly thrilled.

Anytime you are putting something on the internet, you have to assume people are reading it, and they have their own wacky and varied reasons for doing so. A formal follow on Twitter just lets you know who they are, and that’s a courtesy, not a threat. Sure, there’s someone (or a bandstand of someones) staring in your virtual window, but when they follow you it’s like a tap on the glass to let you know they’re there.

follower For people who aren’t bloggers, this is an understandably strange idea, but an important lesson. People put things on their Facebook and Flickr pages all the time that make me gasp. That drunken bday photo? Once it’s out there, you can’t assume that you control who sees it, and taking it down doesn’t prevent someone from copying and re-hosting it somewhere else. Using Twitter on your phone makes this even easier: beware the flippant tweet. (more…)

Something big is happening with TV tonight, I think Facebook takes over?

Friday, June 12th, 2009

I don’t know, because I watch stuff like this, Target Women by Sarah Haskins:


Anyway, in between shopping and asking my lady friends for advice on scented candles, I’m going to Powell’s tonight for a lecture by David Carr (former addict –> NY Times columnist), and then to On Gallery where there is FREE BEER from sponsor Lagunitas and we’re ringing in the new social digital age…where Facebook takes over the TV waves and gives cool people usernames or something. I just hope we can turn off status updates. 10pm-2am, with the Facebook takeover at midnight. Come on by.

#Tgif #RIPTv

Mine magazine from Time customizes a magazine for you, almost

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

mine? mine? mine?I saw an ad for Mine Magazine in Real Simple and went to sign up immediately. It’s so, so close to being brilliant. And yet it’s not. Not because they are lacking in potentially cool articles, but because they don’t personalize it enough and it’s made from regurgitating past issues, the latter of which would be ok if the information was highly tailored to me. But, like a bad date, they don’t ask enough questions about me.

If they really wanted me to feel attended to, they would ask for my feedback on each article and continue tailoring my choices for my future magazines. Pandora does this for music, and Netflix does it for suggested movies in your queue. Why can’t publishers do it for our e-magazines? (more…)

I’m pretty sure Edgar Allan Poe would hate the Kindle

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

kindle shmindle

Doesn’t this ad just seem wrong? How do you think most of those dead writers would feel about being stuffed into a Kindle? I imagine some would be all about new forms of communication, but Poe doesn’t strike me as one of them. Jane Austen would be a deft Twitterer (tweeter, whatever), for example (too bad someone who doesn’t use it has nabbed @JaneAusten). I find her obnoxious, but you know she’d give Perez Hilton (@perezhilton) a run for his money.

But Edgar Allan Poe, I don’t think he’d want anything to do with new fangled techmrology. Redo the ad with Jane, Amazon.